Why the study?
Mechanical alternans has prognostic value in heart failure, but its clinical use is limited by the requirement of costly and impractical continuous blood pressure measurement.
Does photoplethysmography accurately detect mechanical alternans compared to continuous blood pressure measurement in patients undergoing clinical procedures?
Does photoplethysmography accurately detect mechanical alternans compared to continuous blood pressure measurement in patients undergoing clinical procedures?
Photoplethysmography can accurately and non-invasively detect mechanical alternans, offering a practical alternative to continuous blood pressure monitoring for risk stratification.
Offers a non-invasive alternative for mechanical alternans detection; leaves open whether this photopleth.
Background and Significance: Mechanical alternans (MA) is a biomarker associated with mortality and life-threatening arrhythmias in heart failure patients. Despite showing prognostic value, its use is limited by the requirement of measuring the continuous blood pressure (BP), which is costly and impractical. Objective: To develop and test, for the first time, non-invasive MA surrogates based on photoplethysmography (PPG). Methods: Continuous BP and PPG were recorded during clinical procedures and tests in 35 patients. MA was induced either by ventricular pacing (Group A, N = 19) or exercise (Group B, N = 16). MA was categorized as sustained or intermittent if MA episodes were observed in at least 20 or between 12 and 20 consecutive beats, respectively. Eight features characterizing the pulse morphology were derived from the PPG, and MA surrogates were evaluated. Results: Sustained alternans was observed in 9 patients (47%) from Group A, whereas intermittent alternans was observed in 13 patients (68%) from Group A and in 10 patients (63%) from Group B. The PPG-based MA surrogate showing the highest accuracy, V1M, was based on the maximum of the first derivative of the PPG pulse. It detected both sustained and intermittent MA with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in Group A and intermittent MA with 100% sensitivity and 83% specificity in Group B. Furthermore, the magnitudes of MA and its PPG-based surrogate were linearly correlated (R2= 0.83, p <; 0.001). Conclusion: MA can be accurately identified non-invasively through PPG analysis. This may have important clinical implications for risk stratification and remote monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Besleaga et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: