The ability of IgG antibodies purified from mouse antisera to sensitize SRBC∗ or TNP.SRBC for lysis at various concentrations of guinea pig C was studied. Differences in sensitizing capacity were observed between IgG 1 , antibodies directed against SRBC antigens or the TNP moiety, as well as between the IgG 1 , and IgG 2 (IgG 2a or IgG 2b ) antibodies. The IgG 1 , antibodies, which fix haemolytic C by classical pathway activation, could not sensitize target cells for lysis at low C levels and were found to interfere with the sensitization of cells by IgG 2 antibodies. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the loss of IgG 1 lytic activity at low C concentrations and the inhibition of IgG 2 -mediated haemolysis by IgG 1 is due to the presence of IgG 1 antibodies which are unable to fix C. Since the IgG 1 antibodies were structurally intact, it is concluded that two isotypes of mouse IgG 1 exist, one unable and the other able to fix C upon association with antigen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ey et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: