Why the study?
Does incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect myocardial strain assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients?
Does incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect myocardial strain assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients?
Incremental PEEP >10 cmH2O significantly reduces atrial and right ventricular longitudinal strain in mechanically ventilated patients, highlighting the need for caution when interpreting speckle tracking echocardiography in this setting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High PEEP may confound speckle-tracking strain interpretation in ventilated patients; leaves open outcome impact and optimal thresholds.
PURPOSE: The effects of mechanical ventilation (MV) on speckle tracking echocardiography- (STE-)derived variables are not elucidated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation on 4-chamber longitudinal strain (LS) analysis by STE. METHODS: We studied 20 patients admitted to a mixed intensive care unit who required intubation for MV and PEEP titration due to hypoxia. STE was performed at three times: (T1) PEEP = 5 cmH2O; (T2) PEEP = 10 cmH2O; and (T3) PEEP = 15 cmH2O. STE analysis was performed offline using a dedicated software (XStrain MyLab 70 Xvision, Esaote). RESULTS: Left peak atrial-longitudinal strain (LS) was significantly reduced from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3 (P < 0.05). Right peak atrial-LS and right ventricular-LS showed a significant reduction only at T3 (P < 0.05). Left ventricular-LS did not change significantly during titration of PEEP. Cardiac chambers' volumes showed a significant reduction at higher levels of PEEP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated for the first time that incremental PEEP affects myocardial strain values obtained with STE in intubated critically ill patients. Whenever performing STE in mechanically ventilated patients, care must be taken when PEEP is higher than 10 cmH2O to avoid misinterpreting data and making erroneous decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franchi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: