In mouse cardiac isoforms, myosin functionality does not depend on Loop 1 or Loop 2 sequences, suggesting other non-homologous residues are responsible for isoform-specific characteristics.
Does not implicate Loop 1/2 sequences in mouse cardiac myosin function; leaves open other residues as isoform determinants.
Comparison of mammalian cardiac alpha- and beta-myosin heavy chain isoforms reveals 93% identity. To date, genetic methodologies have effected only minor switches in the mammalian cardiac myosin isoforms. Using cardiac-specific transgenesis, we have now obtained major myosin isoform shifts and/or replacements. Clusters of non-identical amino acids are found in functionally important regions, i.e. the surface loops 1 and 2, suggesting that these structures may regulate isoform-specific characteristics. Loop 1 alters filament sliding velocity, whereas Loop 2 modulates actin-activated ATPase rate in Dictyostelium myosin, but this remains untested in mammalian cardiac myosins. Alpha --> beta isoform switches were engineered into mouse hearts via transgenesis. To assess the structural basis of isoform diversity, chimeric myosins in which the sequences of either Loop 1+Loop 2 or Loop 2 of alpha-myosin were exchanged for those of beta-myosin were expressed in vivo. 2-fold differences in filament sliding velocity and ATPase activity were found between the two isoforms. Filament sliding velocity of the Loop 1+Loop 2 chimera and the ATPase activities of both loop chimeras were not significantly different compared with alpha-myosin. In mouse cardiac isoforms, myosin functionality does not depend on Loop 1 or Loop 2 sequences and must lie partially in other non-homologous residues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krenz et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: