Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Highlights the role of aortic pulse wave velocity as the gold standard for arterial stiffness measurement in predicting cardiovascular events.
Age changes the vascular structure and function in the normal population, but it has a different effect on wave reflection and pulse wave transmission Many longitudinal studies have found that arterial stiffness measurement among hypertensive patients, diabetic patients, healthy elderly, and people with high cardiovascular (CV) risk will better evaluate arterial health and predict CV events. European guidance for arterial stiffness measurements described in the European consensus document (2006) [3] , the publication of the international reference standards (2010) [4] and the American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement on arterial stiffness measurements in the USA (2015) have standardized arterial measurement The question now is which measurement of arterial stiffness is more accurate to precisely predict future CV events. Most of the guidelines designated aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV; carotid-femoral PWV) as the golden standard (especially in the Western society) Townsend's [8] brief review on recommendations and standardization of PWV measurements also justified its clinical and scholarly use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: