Key result
Measurement of arterial stiffness, particularly aortic pulse wave velocity, provides additional prognostic value for cardiovascular risk stratification beyond traditional risk factors.
Why the study?
Does the measurement of arterial stiffness provide additional value for cardiovascular risk stratification compared to standard risk scores?
Does the measurement of arterial stiffness provide additional value for cardiovascular risk stratification compared to standard risk scores?
Measurement of arterial stiffness, specifically aortic pulse wave velocity, provides valuable additional information for cardiovascular risk stratification, though methodological variability remains a consideration.
May refine risk stratification beyond standard scores; leaves open need for prospective trials before routine adoption.
Cardiovascular risk stratification is fundamental for the development of effective prevention and therapeutic strategies. Although there are numerous scores and risk tables available, a difference still exists between the estimated and real number of cardiovascular events. Measurement of arterial stiffness can provide additional information to risk stratification. The most widely accepted parameter of arterial stiffness is aortic pulse wave velocity, which has been included in the guideline of the European Society of Hypertension in 2007 and 2013, although American guidelines still omit it. In this review the authors summarize the evidence with regards to the different steps required for clinical application of arterial stiffness measurement and they also discuss the questions that evolved from the methodological variability of different measurement techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemcsik et al. (2015) conducted a review in Cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness measurement (aortic pulse wave velocity) was evaluated. Measurement of arterial stiffness, particularly aortic pulse wave velocity, provides additional prognostic value for cardiovascular risk stratification beyond traditional risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: