Why the study?
What is the incidence, indications, and predisposing factors for pacemaker placement in pediatric heart transplant recipients?
What is the incidence, indications, and predisposing factors for pacemaker placement in pediatric heart transplant recipients?
Permanent pacemaker placement is uncommon (2.8%) in pediatric heart transplant recipients but can be performed safely with excellent clinical results, with lower early post-transplant heart rates predicting the need for pacing due to sick sinus syndrome.
Early bradycardia may flag pacing risk in pediatric transplant recipients; leaves open prospective validation of monitoring thresholds.
This study was undertaken to assess the incidence, indications, and predisposing factors for pacemaker placement in a pediatric heart transplant population. From November 1985 to May 1994, 246 pediatric patients have undergone cardiac transplantation at Loma Linda University Medical Center. Seven (2.8%) have received pacemaker placement with an 8-50 month follow-up period. Median age at transplant was 462 days (0 days to 2.5 years). The median time to pacemaker placement was 190 days (18-1,672 days) after transplantation. Indications were sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in 5 and heart block in 2 patients (1 during acute rejection). Three patients with SSS underwent electrophysiology studies (EPS); 1 was normal and 2 showed sinus node dysfunction. The mode of pacing was VVIR in 6 patients and VVI in 1 patient. All 6 survivors are doing well and 5 patients' pacemakers still provide support. These 7 patients were compared with 185 pediatric patients (0 days to 12-years-old) transplanted during 1985 through 1993 who survived at least 6 months after transplantation. There was no correlation between the receipt of a pacemaker and graft cold ischemic time, rejection history, donor age, or recipient age at transplantation. The 5 patients with SSS had significantly lower average heart rates in the first month after transplantation (108 +/- 16 vs 130 +/- 12; P = 0.0002). The need for permanent pacemakers in this population is uncommon. Pacemakers, however, can be safely performed when necessary with excellent clinical results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinnock et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: