Why the study?
Does ACE2 activation with XNT prevent early retinal injuries in a rat model of hyperglycemia?
Does ACE2 activation with XNT prevent early retinal injuries in a rat model of hyperglycemia?
Activation of endogenous ACE2 with XNT reduces apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in a rat model of hyperglycemia, suggesting a potential protective role in early diabetic retinopathy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for retinal ganglion cell protection in hyperglycemia; leaves open translation to human diabetic retinopathy.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus that may result in blindness. We evaluated the effects of activation of endogenous angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) 2 on the early stages of DR. Rats were administered an intravenous injection of streptozotocin to induce hyperglycemia. The ACE2 activator 1-[[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl] amino]-4-(hydroxymethyl)-7-[[(4-methylphenyl) sulfonyl] oxy]-9H-xanthone 9 (XNT) was administered by daily gavage. The death of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) was evaluated in histological sections, and retinal ACE2, caspase-3, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expressions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. XNT treatment increased ACE2 expression in retinas of hyperglycemic (HG) rats (control: 13.81±2.71 area%; HG: 14.29±4.30 area%; HG+XNT: 26.87±1.86 area%; P<0.05). Importantly, ACE2 activation significantly increased the RCG number in comparison with HG animals (control: 553.5±14.29; HG: 530.8±10.3 cells; HG+XNT: 575.3±16.5 cells; P<0.05). This effect was accompanied by a reduction in the expression of caspase-3 in RGC of the HG+XNT group when compared with untreated HG rats (control: 18.74±1.59; HG: 38.39±3.39 area%; HG+XNT: 27.83±2.80 area%; P<0.05). Treatment with XNT did not alter the VEGF expression in HG animals (P>0.05). Altogether, these findings indicate that activation of ACE2 reduced the death of retinal ganglion cells by apoptosis in HG rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foureaux et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: