Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The discourse of defendants in courtroom proceedings was examined by means of tape recordings from Viennese trials. A method for systematic study is expounded and applied. It emerges that discourse is a major determinant in the outcome of a trial, because it heavily controls the role projection defendants can attain: social class, income, respectability, responsibility, and believability. A skillfully and fluently presented testimony may be believed, irrespective of the facts of the case. Specific discourse features are correlated with “socio‐psychological styles” in defendants’ interaction with the judge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruth Wodak (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: