Between-subjects experiment finds lower perceived comprehensibility for neopronouns in French readers, indicating new gender-neutral forms do not broadly impair reading comprehension.
Gender-neutral pronouns are often criticized for diminishing text quality, yet little empirical research has addressed this issue in grammatical gender languages such as French. This study presents the first investigation into the comprehensibility and appreciation of two French gender-neutral neopronouns, iel and al. Using a between-subjects experimental design, 400 participants read a text containing one of four referential strategies: binary pronouns, iel, al, or name repetition. They then responded to measures assessing word difficulty, sentence difficulty, subjective comprehensibility, text appreciation, content question accuracy, and other control variables. Results indicated that texts with iel and al were partially perceived as less comprehensible than those using name repetition and texts with iel were less appreciated than texts with binary pronouns. However, only al negatively impacted content question accuracy. These findings, in line with studies from other languages, suggest that the linguistic system may influence the evaluation of gender-neutral pronouns, while providing little evidence that they impair performance on content questions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vincent et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: