Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intravenous morphine titration is used to obtain postoperative pain relief, but few studies have assessed the appropriate regimen. In a quality programme, we performed a prospective non-randomized study of morphine titration in a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS: Four regimens of morphine titration were studied: every 10 (group 1, n = 400) or 5 min (group 2, n = 400) with a maximum of five intravenous boluses; every 5 min, without any limitation in the number of boluses (groups 3 and 4, n = 400 each); in groups 1, 2, and 3, subcutaneous morphine was administered 4 h after titration. In group 4, administration of subcutaneous morphine was allowed only 2 h after titration. A visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) > 30 mm was required to administer morphine and pain relief was defined as a VAPS < or = 30 mm. RESULTS: After morphine titration, VAPS was lower and the number of patients with pain relief was greater in patients from groups 3 and 4. Patients from group 4 had the lowest VAPS (26 +/- 17 mm) and the highest percentage of pain relief (73%) at the end of the PACU period. The number of sedated patients increased in groups 3 (62%) and 4 (61%) compared with group 1 (27%). No significant differences in morphine-related adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Intravenous morphine titration every 5 min with an unlimited number of boluses and early subcutaneous administration provided the best analgesic regimen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aubrun et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: