Theoretical modeling demonstrates almost-sure ergodic convergence in constrained multi-agent swarms, identifying a sharp connectivity threshold required for cooperative coverage.
We study decentralised ergodic control for multi-agent systems operating over stochastic, lossy communication graphs. Each agent follows controlled stochastic dynamics with uniformly elliptic noise on a compact domain and aims to align its occupation measure with a prescribed target distribution π. We separate two regimes. (i) In the decoupled regime – perfect self-observation, static π, no global coupling – communication is unnecessary: each agent alone can attain μiT⇒π almost surely. (ii) In the team-coupled regime, agents are coupled through a coverage – fairness objective and a shared energy budget, which makes tracking the team-mean occupation measure indispensable. For the coupled regime, we introduce a consensus filter that mixes local coverage estimates over random time-varying graphs while incorporating per-step innovations from fresh samples. Under an explicit Dobrushin-scrambling assumption with exponentially rare mixing failures, square-summable stepsizes and uniformly elliptic dynamics, we prove almost-sure convergence of each agent's empirical measure to π in W1. The analysis replaces informal o(1) arguments with an adapted, summable error sequence and a Robbins–Siegmund-type lemma tailored to measure-valued recursions. We further identify a sharp temporal-connectivity threshold: below it, disagreement persists and team ergodicity fails with non-vanishing probability; above it, deviations obey exponential tails and coverage fluctuations satisfy a large-deviation principle. The framework unifies decentralised decision-making, ergodic coverage and random-graph consensus, and applies to robotic teams, drone swarms and distributed sensing under severe communication constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramen Ghosh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: