Why the study?
PVI alone shows limited long-term success in persistent AF, and additional ablation targeting spatiotemporal dispersion areas yields variable outcomes, but AI integration could standardize these procedures.
Does AI-guided SDA ablation combined with PVI improve 12-month freedom from AF in patients with persistent AF?
Population
322 patients with persistent AF across 3 studies
Comparison
PVI combined with AI-guided SDA ablation vs PVI alone or unstated
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 studies
Follow-up
12 months
Key result
AI-guided spatiotemporal dispersion area ablation combined with PVI achieved an 87% freedom-from-AF rate, and demonstrated superiority to PVI alone in one RCT (89% vs. 67%, P=0.001).
Authors
Loading...
AI-guided SDA ablation plus PVI improves 1-year AF elimination versus PVI alone; extends individualized ablation strategies in persistent AF.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (n=322)
Does AI-guided SDA ablation combined with PVI improve 12-month freedom from AF in patients with persistent AF?
AI-guided SDA ablation combined with PVI may improve 12-month freedom from AF in patients with persistent AF, though evidence is currently limited to a small number of studies.
Raffaello et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=322). AI-guided SDA ablation combined with PVI vs. PVI alone was evaluated on 12-month freedom from AF after a 3-month blanking period (95% CI 82-91). AI-guided spatiotemporal dispersion area ablation combined with PVI achieved an 87% freedom-from-AF rate, and demonstrated superiority to PVI alone in one RCT (89% vs. 67%, P=0.001).