Policy evaluation study demonstrates that industrial upgrading policies accelerate energy transitions in legacy cities, highlighting structural mismatches between technology and infrastructure.
Industrial legacy cities are trapped in carbon lock-in—a self-reinforcing condition where fossil-fuel infrastructure, industrial structures, and institutional inertia collectively resist urban energy transition. Yet whether and how industrial upgrading policies (IUP) can effectively disrupt this lock-in remains unclear. Using panel data from 148 Chinese legacy cities over 2012–2022, we employ a staggered difference-in-differences model combined with policy-text quantification to evaluate the effects of IUP. Results show that IUP significantly raises urban energy transition by 2.52 percentage points, with technology-enabling instruments delivering the strongest leverage among the three policy tool categories. Mechanism analysis uncovers a co-evolutionary mismatch: green technology innovation mediates 42.21% of the total effect, while the mediating pathway through energy consumption structure remains statistically insignificant—evidence that production-side innovation and energy-side infrastructure exhibit systematically divergent adjustment elasticities in response to industrial upgrading policy. Policy effects also differ across city types, with stronger responses in old industrial base, regenerative, and single-type cities. These findings advance carbon lock-in theory by identifying co-evolutionary mismatch as a distinct source of structural friction in urban industrial transitions and provide actionable pathways for aligning urban industrial restructuring with decarbonization goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: