Key result
Preoperative levosimendan in pediatric LVAD candidates did not significantly reduce early right ventricular failure or in-hospital mortality compared to standard inotropic therapy.
Why the study?
Pediatric patients undergoing LVAD implantation represent a unique cohort with ongoing efforts to prolong survival, prompting evaluation of the effects of preoperative levosimendan on postoperative outcomes.
Does preoperative levosimendan reduce early right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients undergoing LVAD implantation?
Cohort
Does preoperative levosimendan reduce early right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients undergoing LVAD implantation?
Preoperative levosimendan in pediatric LVAD candidates appears safe and improves liver function tests but does not reduce right ventricular failure or in-hospital mortality compared to standard inotropes.
Hypothesis-generating for levosimendan in pediatric LVAD; does not support practice change without randomized data.
OBJECTIVE: The pediatric patient group undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is small and unique. Many efforts have been made to prolong survival. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of levosimendan administration on postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing LVAD implantation. METHODS: = 17), who received standard inotropic therapy alone. Levosimendan was administered at a dose of 0.1 µg/kg/min for 72 h without a loading bolus. Primary outcomes were early right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for right ventricular assist, late right ventricular failure, and changes in organ function as assessed by liver and kidney function tests. Safety points for drug administration were defined as arrhythmia, hypotension, and sudden arrest. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (except LVEDD), ventricular function, and vasoactive inotropic scores were similar between the groups. No significant difference was observed in terms of early right ventricular failure, in-hospital mortality, or length of hospital stay. The rates of need for right ventricular assist and late right ventricular failure were comparable. Improvements in organ function were observed in both groups; significantly greater reductions in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were recorded in the levosimendan group. No treatment-limiting side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Preoperative levosimendan administration seems to be safe in pediatric LVAD candidates and is associated with improved end-organ function, although it has not demonstrated superiority over standard inotropic therapy in terms of preventing right ventricular failure or reducing mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pediatric patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Levosimendan vs. Standard inotropic therapy alone was evaluated on Early right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality. Preoperative levosimendan in pediatric LVAD candidates did not significantly reduce early right ventricular failure or in-hospital mortality compared to standard inotropic therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: