Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interventional study reveals improved mathematics discussion-leading moves among practicing teachers following targeted training, indicating varying benefits from distinct learning formats.
Mathematics discussions are central for both teaching practice and student engagement with mathematics, though modal teaching practice in many countries often does not include discussion-leading. There has been a press for professional development that increases teachers’ use of discussion-leading in mathematics. This paper examines the impact of two key components of an intensive professional development on practicing teachers’ mathematics discussion-leading practice: live observation and practice-focused learning sessions. A tool for examining specific discussion-leading moves was used to measure change in teachers’ practice as observed through submitted video recordings of mathematics discussions. Participants included 44 teachers from three school districts who submitted a total of 255 videos across the study. The findings show that both key components of the professional development positively impacted teaching practice but had differential impacts on participating groups. We explore factors that could contribute to these differential outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: