Why the study?
Does ioxaglate reduce patient discomfort compared to iopamidol during internal mammary arteriography?
Does ioxaglate reduce patient discomfort compared to iopamidol during internal mammary arteriography?
Ioxaglate is significantly better tolerated and causes less discomfort than iopamidol when used as a contrast agent for internal mammary arteriography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ioxaglate reduces discomfort versus iopamidol during internal mammary arteriography; supports preferential use in this setting.
To compare discomfort caused by ioxaglate and iopamidol, 25 patients scheduled for coronary angiography including internal mammary arteriography were studied. Each patient received both agents. Data were available on 22 randomly selected patients who completed the protocol. Two patients were withdrawn because of unsuccessful internal mammary artery cannulation and one because of idiosyncratic reaction to diazepam. After the internal mammary artery injections, the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was completed to evaluate the patient response. Ioxaglate caused significantly less discomfort than iopamidol. Word scale (WS) p less than .05; visual analog scale (VAS) p less than .05. We conclude that ioxaglate is much better tolerated than iopamidol in internal mammary arteriography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: