Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 22, 2026Education SciencesOpen Access

When Schools Are Equal but Children Are Not: A Multilevel Analysis of Home-Driven Variance and Cumulative Disadvantage in Early Childhood

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

OHOrhan Hanbay

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Cross-sectional study finds home literacy and socioeconomic status drive learning disparities in preschool-aged children, indicating that standardized preschools cannot fully bridge early gaps.

Key Points

  • To examine why substantial developmental disparities persist among children despite standardized institutional inputs across early childhood education and care centres.
  • Analyzed OECD International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study (IELS 2025) data from 2,363 five-year-olds across 200 early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres in the Flemish Community of Belgium.
  • Measured children's cognitive and executive functions using direct tablet-based assessments and gathered home environment metrics via parent reports, handling missing data with 20 multiply imputed datasets.
  • Estimated two-level hierarchical linear models using 92 balanced repeated replication (BRR) weights pooled across five plausible values to assess direct and indirect associations.
  • Between-centre variation was comparatively low, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of approximately 23% for foundational learning and 11% for executive function.
  • Within centres, foundational learning was significantly associated with family socioeconomic status (B = 25.11, p < 0.001) and the print-focused home literacy index (B = 16.60, p < 0.001), with centre socioeconomic composition also showing a strong association (B = 36.38, p < 0.001).
  • Executive function mediated the within-centre association between home literacy and foundational learning (indirect effect = 3.60, 95% Monte Carlo CI [1.83, 5.40]), alongside an exploratory between-centre indirect effect (8.40, 95% CI [1.16, 15.65]).

Cite This Study

Orhan Hanbay (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a895fd3ca7ade938187ebbbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16081335
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Relationship Between Extracurricular Activity Involvement and Elementary Student Performance2024
  2. 2Multidimensional influences on children’s cognitive development in school based on young lives data: A multilevel analysis2025
  3. 3Do preschool cognitive and executive function skills explain the school readiness gap between socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged South African children&amp;#63;2026
  4. 4Socioeconomic Gradients in Early Chinese Language and Literacy and Numeracy: The Role of Executive Function2026
  5. 5Diverging Paths: Heterogeneity in Early Childhood Executive Function Development in Chile2026