Cross-sectional study demonstrates adiposity explains more variation in testosterone than age in adult men, indicating body fat is the primary driver of testosterone suppression.
Context Age-related decline in serum testosterone is commonly cited as justification for testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), yet adiposity may represent a major modifiable determinant of circulating testosterone. Objective To quantify the relative contributions of age, total adiposity, and visceral adiposity to circulating testosterone concentrations and prevalence of biochemical low testosterone in U.S. adult men. Design Cross-sectional nationally representative analysis. Setting National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011–2016. Participants Men aged 20–59 years with valid serum testosterone measurements (n=4,984). Main Outcome Measures Total testosterone (ng/dL) and prevalence of biochemical low testosterone (testosterone <300 ng/dL). Results Age explained only 2.5% of the variation in circulating testosterone (pseudo-R2=0.025). In contrast, DXA-derived total percent body fat and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and waist circumference each explained approximately 18-20% of testosterone variability. Waist circumference demonstrated slightly greater explanatory performance than DXA-derived VAT, indicating that simple anthropometric assessment captures much of the clinically relevant information provided by advanced imaging. Similar inverse associations were observed using multiple biochemical testosterone thresholds (300, 250, 200, and 150 ng/dL). Biochemically low testosterone was consistently associated with substantially greater adiposity across all age groups. Conclusions Measures of adiposity consistently demonstrated substantially stronger associations with circulating testosterone than chronological age alone. Waist circumference performed comparably to DXA-derived VAT, supporting its use as a clinically accessible marker of obesity-related testosterone suppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: