Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Purpose: To present a series of patients who had 21-gauge microphacoemulsification using Sovereign WhiteStar technology. Setting: John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: Eighteen consecutive patients with cataracts judged to be 3+ or 4+ on a 4-point scale were prospectively monitored for complications, energy used during phacoemulsification, and results 1 day and 3 months postoperatively. Results: No complications occurred during nucleus removal. On a 4-point scale, the mean level of inflammation at 1 day was 0.9 ± 0.5 (SD), with 13 patients having no corneal edema. Seven patients had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better on the first postoperative day. At 3 months, all corneas were clear, there was no sign of anterior chamber inflammation, and all patients had a best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better (best-case analysis). Conclusion: Results show that 21-gauge microphacoemulsification with Sovereign WhiteStar technology is safe and effective for removal of hard cataracts. Microphacoemulsification with Sovereign WhiteStar technology was successful in removing dense cataracts in a consecutive series of 18 patients. This approach allows insertion of IOLs through incisions smaller than 2.0 mm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randall J. Olson (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: