Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comparison was made of the incidence of venous thrombophlebitis resulting from the use of a high-osmolality contrast medium (Conray 60%, meglumine iothalamate), and a low-osmolality contrast medium (Niopam 61%, iopamidol). In 20 patients Conray was injected into one leg and Niopam into the other. The incidence of thrombophlebitis was then determined using the iodine-125 fibrinogen uptake test in a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. There was significantly less thrombophlebitis with Niopam than with Conray and it is concluded that Niopam is a safer contrast medium for phlebography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: