Key result
Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia in children using an electroanatomical-mapping system achieved a final success rate of 84.6% over a mean follow-up of 51.35 months.
Why the study?
Atrial tachycardia in children is often resistant to medical therapy, catheter ablation can be curative, but experience with pediatric AT ablation remains very limited.
Does electroanatomical mapping-guided catheter ablation safely and effectively treat atrial tachycardia in children with limited or zero fluoroscopy?
Observational (n=39)
No
Does electroanatomical mapping-guided catheter ablation safely and effectively treat atrial tachycardia in children with limited or zero fluoroscopy?
Electroanatomical mapping-guided catheter ablation is a safe and effective treatment for atrial tachycardia in children, allowing for zero or minimal fluoroscopy exposure.
May support zero-fluoroscopy ablation for pediatric atrial tachycardia; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is an uncommon cause of supraventricular tachycardia in children and it is often resistant to medical therapy. Catheter ablation can be curative in children with AT. However, experience of ablation of pediatric AT is still very limited. The aim of this study, which is the largest series from a single center, was to assess the efficacy and safety of ablation of AT using an electroanatomical-mapping system. METHODS: It was a retrospective review of 39 children with AT who underwent catheter ablation procedure using the EnSite Velocity system (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) between July 2012 and April 2017. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 13.32 ± 6.82 years. The location of AT was right sided in 25 and left sided in 13, and both sides in one patient. The mean procedure time was 184.23 ± 60.19 min. Fluoroscopy was not used in 25 of 39 patients. The mean fluoroscopy time in the remaining patients was 5.53 ± 5.22 min. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was used in 22, cryoablation was used in 10, and both RF and cryoablation were used in seven. Acute success was achieved in 34 patients (87.2%). During a mean follow-up of 51.35 ± 12.62 months, AT recurred in five patients. These patients underwent second ablation procedures and four of them were successful. Final success was achieved in 33 out of 39 patients (84.6%). There were no complications except for one patient who had an uneventful pericardial needle injury during transseptal puncture without effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of AT in children can be performed safely and effectively with a limited fluoroscopy using electroanatomical mapping systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkıran et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial tachycardia (n=39). Catheter ablation using the EnSite Velocity system was evaluated on Final success of ablation. Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia in children using an electroanatomical-mapping system achieved a final success rate of 84.6% over a mean follow-up of 51.35 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: