Key result
Elevated visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was associated with increased CSF phosphorylated tau (β=0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.97), increased total tau, and decreased β-amyloid levels at follow-up.
Why the study?
Blood pressure variability is an emerging risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability correlate with changes in CSF Alzheimer disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired or mildly impaired older adults?
Cohort (n=466)
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability correlate with changes in CSF Alzheimer disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired or mildly impaired older adults?
Effect estimate: β 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.97)
Elevated visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is associated with adverse changes in CSF Alzheimer disease biomarkers over time, suggesting a potential mechanism linking blood pressure fluctuations to cognitive decline.
Supports BP variability monitoring in older adults at AD risk; leaves open whether stabilization alters tau/amyloid trajectories.
Background and Objectives Blood pressure variability is an emerging risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia, but mechanisms remain unclear. The current study examined whether visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is related to CSF Alzheimer disease biomarker levels over time and whether associations differed by APOE ε4 carrier status. Methods In this retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study, cognitively unimpaired or mildly impaired older adults from the Alzheimer9s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative underwent 3 to 4 blood pressure measurements over a 12-month period and ≥1 lumbar puncture for evaluation of CSF phosphorylated tau, total tau, and β-amyloid levels at follow-up (6–108 months later). APOE ε4 carriers were defined as having ≥1 ε4 allele. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was determined over 12 months as variability independent of mean. Only CSF samples collected after the final blood pressure measurement were analyzed. Bayesian linear growth modeling investigated the role of blood pressure variability, APOE ε4, and the passage of time on CSF biomarker levels after controlling for several variables, including average blood pressure and baseline hypertension. Results Four hundred sixty-six participants (mean 76.7 [SD 7.1] years of age) were included in the study. Elevated blood pressure variability was associated with increased CSF phosphorylated tau (β = 0.81 [95% CI 0.74, 0.97]), increased total tau (β = 0.98 [95% CI 0.71, 1.31]), and decreased β-amyloid levels (β = −1.52 [95% CI −3.55, −0.34]) at follow-up. APOE ε4 carriers with elevated blood pressure variability had the fastest increase in phosphorylated tau levels (β = 9.03 [95% CI 1.67, 16.36]). Blood pressure variability was not significantly related to total tau or β-amyloid levels over time according to APOE ε4 carrier status. Discussion Older adults with elevated blood pressure variability exhibit increased CSF phosphorylated tau, increased total tau, and decreased β-amyloid over time, suggesting that blood pressure variability may correlate with alterations in Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Findings warrant further study of the relationship between blood pressure variability and the development of Alzheimer disease. APOE ε4 carrier status moderated relationships between blood pressure variability and CSF phosphorylated tau but not total tau or β-amyloid, consistent with other studies relating hemodynamic factors to tau changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sible et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cognitive impairment (n=466). Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability vs. Lower blood pressure variability was evaluated on CSF phosphorylated tau levels at follow-up (β 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.97). Elevated visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was associated with increased CSF phosphorylated tau (β=0.81; 95% CI 0.74-0.97), increased total tau, and decreased β-amyloid levels at follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: