Key result
Ultrasound-derived fat fraction accurately detected hepatic steatosis (AUCs up to 0.99) and exhibited a significantly higher AUC than CAP for detecting steatosis grade S3 (P=0.037).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction for detecting hepatic steatosis in patients with steatotic liver disease, using histopathology as the gold standard.
Does ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) accurately detect and grade hepatic steatosis compared to histopathology and CAP in patients with suspected steatotic liver disease?
Observational (n=66)
Does ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) accurately detect and grade hepatic steatosis compared to histopathology and CAP in patients with suspected steatotic liver disease?
p-value: p=0.037
Ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for grading hepatic steatosis, outperforming controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for severe steatosis, offering a reliable non-invasive quantitative imaging approach.
PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) for detecting hepatic steatosis in patients with steatotic liver disease (SLD), using liver biopsy and histopathology as the gold standard. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients referred for evaluation of suspected SLD were enrolled. All patients underwent UDFF and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurements. Histopathological findings were assessed using the steatosis-activity-fibrosis scoring system as the gold standard. Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses and multivariate linear regression were performed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were utilized to assess the diagnostic performance of UDFF and CAP in identifying hepatic steatosis. The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs. RESULTS: From February 2023 to May 2025, 66 patients were included. The median body mass index was 24 kg/m2. UDFF was positively correlated with hepatic steatosis grade (r=0.66). Using UDFF thresholds of 9.5%, 14.5%, and 16.3% (determined by the Youden index), the AUCs for detecting steatosis grades ≥S1, ≥S2, and S3 were 0.82, 0.90, and 0.99, respectively. UDFF exhibited a significantly higher AUC than CAP for detecting steatosis grade S3 (P=0.037). UDFF was correlated with hepatic steatosis grade, activity grade, CAP, aspartate aminotransferase level, and albumin level (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: UDFF demonstrated good diagnostic performance for assessing hepatic steatosis, using histopathology as the reference. UDFF may serve as a quantitative imaging approach to measure liver fat content in patients with SLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Steatotic liver disease (n=66). Ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF) vs. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) was evaluated on Detection of hepatic steatosis grade S3 (p=0.037). Ultrasound-derived fat fraction accurately detected hepatic steatosis (AUCs up to 0.99) and exhibited a significantly higher AUC than CAP for detecting steatosis grade S3 (P=0.037).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: