This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Level 3 automated driving systems require drivers to occasionally retake control, making it crucial to understand factors influencing takeover performance. This study investigates how single versus multiple non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) affect driver behavior, perceptions, and takeover capability. Using a high-fidelity driving simulator with 32 participants, conditions varying NDRT types and task-switching frequency were examined. Results indicate that diverse NDRT engagement and frequent task switching significantly influence takeover performance. Moreover, our decision tree models highlighted the number of NDRT types and task-switching frequency as critical predictors of driver response effectiveness. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for task engagement diversity and switching behaviors in automated vehicle system design. This study provides practical implications for optimizing human-automation interactions and enhancing the safety of automated driving systems by managing drivers' attentiveness for their in-cabin activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: