Key result
Hospital observation stay use has a modest inverse correlation with risk-standardized readmission rates for AMI (r=-0.34), heart failure (r=-0.26), and pneumonia (r=-0.21) (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does hospital use of observation stays correlate with risk-standardized readmission rates in Medicare beneficiaries discharged after AMI, heart failure, or pneumonia?
Population
Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged after acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or…
Design
Cross-sectional
Follow-up
30-day
Authors
Loading...
Observation stays should not yet alter readmission reporting; leaves open whether inclusion meaningfully shifts hospital performance rankings.
Cross-Sectional
Yes
Does hospital use of observation stays correlate with risk-standardized readmission rates in Medicare beneficiaries discharged after AMI, heart failure, or pneumonia?
Effect estimate: r=-0.34 (AMI), r=-0.26 (heart failure), r=-0.21 (pneumonia)
p-value: p=<0.001
Counting observation stays in readmission measures would minimally impact public reporting of hospital performance for AMI, heart failure, and pneumonia.
Venkatesh et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. Hospital use of observation stays was evaluated on Correlation between hospital observation proportion and risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) (r=-0.34 (AMI), r=-0.26 (heart failure), r=-0.21 (pneumonia), p=<0.001). Hospital observation stay use has a modest inverse correlation with risk-standardized readmission rates for AMI (r=-0.34), heart failure (r=-0.26), and pneumonia (r=-0.21) (P<0.001).