Key result
Morning warfarin administration did not significantly improve the percent change in proportion of time outside the therapeutic INR range compared to evening administration (difference 4.4%).
Why the study?
Clinicians commonly recommend taking warfarin in the evening without supporting evidence, leaving the effect of administration time on anticoagulation stability unproven.
Does morning warfarin administration improve anticoagulation stability compared to evening administration in community-dwelling warfarin users?
RCT (n=217)
PROBE (Prospective randomized, open, blinded-endpoint)
Web-based allocation, stratified by percentage of readings within therapeutic range, variable blocks of 2 or 4
Yes
Does morning warfarin administration improve anticoagulation stability compared to evening administration in community-dwelling warfarin users?
Mean Difference: 4.4 (95% CI -17.6–27.3)
Absolute Event Rate: -22.9% vs -11.9%
p-value: p=0.62
Administration time (morning vs evening) has no significant impact on the stability of warfarin's anticoagulant effect, suggesting patients should take it whenever compliance is easiest.
Morning and evening warfarin dosing yield equivalent INR stability; confirms timing flexibility to optimize adherence.
PURPOSE Without supporting evidence, clinicians commonly recommend that warfarin be taken in the evening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of administration time (morning vs evening) on the stability of warfarin’s anticoagulant effect. METHODS A total of 236 primary care physicians serving 54 western Canadian communities mailed letters of invitation to all their warfarin-using patients. Eligible patients were community-dwelling warfarin users (any indication) with at least 3 months of evening warfarin use and no plans for discontinuation. Participants were randomized (by web-based allocation) to morning vs continued evening warfarin ingestion. We used the Rosendaal method to determine the proportion of time within therapeutic range (TTR) of the international normalized ratio (INR) blood test month 2 to 7 postrandomization vs the 6 months prerandomization. The primary outcome was the percent change in proportion of time outside target INR range (with an a priori minimum clinically important difference of ±20%). All analyses were intention to treat. RESULTS Between March 8, 2015 and September 30, 2016, we randomized 109 participants to morning and 108 to evening warfarin use. TTR rose from 71.8% to 74.7% in the morning group, and from 72.6% to 75.6% in the evening group, for a change in TTR of 2.9% in the former vs 3.0% in the latter (difference, –0.1%; P = .97; 95% CI for the difference, –6.1% to 5.9%). The difference in percent change in proportion of time outside the therapeutic INR range (obtained via Hodges-Lehmann estimation of the difference in medians) was 4.4% (P = .62; 95% CI for the difference, –17.6% to 27.3%). CONCLUSIONS Administration time has no statistically significant nor clinically important impact on the stability of warfarin’s anticoagulant effect. Patients should take warfarin whenever regular compliance would be easiest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrison et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Warfarin users (any indication) (n=217). Morning warfarin administration vs. Continued evening warfarin administration was evaluated on Percent change in proportion of time outside target INR range (Difference in medians 4.4%, 95% CI -17.6 to 27.3, p=0.62). Morning warfarin administration did not significantly improve the percent change in proportion of time outside the therapeutic INR range compared to evening administration (difference 4.4%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: