Key result
Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a dog femoral artery showed computed compliance decreased from 0.198% diameter change/mmHg at 72.5 mmHg to 0.145% at 140.7 mmHg.
Fluid-structure interaction analysis suggests that ex vivo elasticity measurements may alter the compliance of the artery, leading to overestimation at higher physiological pressures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ex vivo compliance measurements may overestimate arterial stiffness at higher pressures; animal data leave translation to human in vivo use open.
The in vivo and ex vivo compliance of arteries are expected to be closely related and estimated. Fluid-structure interaction analysis can assess the agreement between the two compli-ances. To evaluate this hypothesis, a pulsatile fluid-structure interaction analysis of blood flow in femoral artery of a dog was conducted using: (1) measured in vivo mean pressure (72.5 mmHg), mean pressure drop (0.59 mmHg), mean velocity (15.1 cm/sec); and (2) ex vivo measurements of non – linear elastic properties of femoral artery. Additional analyses were conducted for physio-logical pressures (104.1 and 140.7 mmHg) and blood flow using a characteristic linear pressure – flow relationship. The computed compliance decreased from 0.198 % diameter change/mmHg at 72.5 mmHg to 0.145 % diameter change/mmHg at 140.7 mmHg. The computed compliance tends to match well with in vivo compliance of femoral artery at lower pressure but is overestimated at higher pressure. This suggests an alteration in the compliance of the artery during ex vivo elasticity measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2008) studied this question. Fluid-structure interaction analysis was evaluated on Computed arterial compliance. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a dog femoral artery showed computed compliance decreased from 0.198% diameter change/mmHg at 72.5 mmHg to 0.145% at 140.7 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: