Key result
An optimized protocol was developed for the extraction of proteins from the human mitral valve, enabling subsequent quantitative proteomics and immunoblotting analysis.
Describes an optimized protocol for extracting proteins from the challenging human mitral valve tissue, enabling comprehensive proteomic analysis.
Analysis of the cellular proteome can help to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying diseases due to the development of technologies that permit the large-scale identification and quantification of the proteins present in complex biological systems.The knowledge gained from a proteomic approach can potentially lead to a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying diseases, allowing for the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic disease markers, and, hopefully, of therapeutic targets. However, the cardiac mitral valve represents a very challenging sample for proteomic analysis because of the low cellularity in proteoglycan and collagen-enriched extracellular matrix. This makes it challenging to extract proteins for a global proteomic analysis. This work describes a protocol that is compatible with subsequent protein analysis, such as quantitative proteomics and immunoblotting. This can allow for the correlation of data concerning protein expression with data on quantitative mRNA expression and non-quantitative immunohistochemical analysis. Indeed, these approaches, when performed together, will lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying diseases, from mRNA to post-translational protein modification. Thus, this method can be relevant to researchers interested in the study of cardiac valve physiopathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banfi et al. (2017) studied Cardiac valve physiopathology. Optimized protocol for protein extraction was evaluated. An optimized protocol was developed for the extraction of proteins from the human mitral valve, enabling subsequent quantitative proteomics and immunoblotting analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: