Key result
This literature review describes current available valve technologies, surgical techniques, anesthetic considerations, and future directions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
This review summarizes the evolution, current technologies, surgical techniques, and anesthetic considerations of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Serves as TAVR reference for clinicians; leaves open prospective validation of emerging technologies.
Since the 1960s when the first aortic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was performed, continuous growth in the field of valvular technology has occurred. Although SAVR remains a lifesaving procedure, minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve replacement has revolutionized and expanded aortic valve replacement to patients who were not previously SAVR candidates, increasing their quality of life and survival. Since its introduction in the United States in 2011, the technology and practice have rapidly expanded. Hybrid techniques have been developed that combine surgical access to the vasculature with valvular deployment over transcatheter systems. This literature review aims to describe the differences between the current available valve technologies, review approaches to surgical technique, discuss anesthetic considerations, and look forward to future directions, trends, and challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goeddel et al. (2018) conducted a review in Aortic valve disease. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was evaluated. This literature review describes current available valve technologies, surgical techniques, anesthetic considerations, and future directions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: