Key result
Doppler ultrasonography established normal arterial blood flow velocities in healthy Beagle dogs, with mean peak systolic velocity of the abdominal aorta at 121 +/- 24 cm/s.
Observational (n=10)
Provides reference values for arterial blood flow velocities and waveforms in healthy conscious Beagle dogs using Doppler ultrasonography.
Provides reference velocities in healthy Beagles; leaves open validation for clinical or diseased canine populations.
Normal values of arterial blood flow velocity and waveforms in major arteries of 10 healthy conscious Beagle dogs were determined using Doppler ultrasonography. Peak systolic, early diastolic, and end-diastolic velocities of the basilar artery, common carotid artery, abdominal aorta, external iliac artery, femoral artery, and peak ejection velocity of the valvular aorta were evaluated. Pulsatility index (PI) of the basilar artery and blood pressure were recorded. All arteries had a high-resistance flow pattern with triphasic flow velocity except the basilar artery, which had a low-resistance pattern. Mean peak systolic velocities of the basilar artery, common carotid artery, abdominal aorta, external iliac artery, and femoral artery were 72 +/- 19, 115 +/- 17, 121 +/- 24, 105 +/- 25, and 110 +/- 17 cm/s, respectively. The PI of the basilar artery and peak ejection velocity of the valvular aorta were 1.37 +/- 0.13 and 96 +/- 16 cm/s, respectively. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 137 +/- 13 and 78 +/- 15 mmHg, respectively. Present findings may be used as references in future studies on vascular diseases and hemodynamics in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=10). Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated on Arterial blood flow velocity and waveforms. Doppler ultrasonography established normal arterial blood flow velocities in healthy Beagle dogs, with mean peak systolic velocity of the abdominal aorta at 121 +/- 24 cm/s.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: