The structure of the reconstructed Si(100) surface is studied using the tight-binding energy minimization method combined with a renormalization-group calculation. (2×1), c(2×2), p(2×2), (4×1), c(4×2), and p(4×2) structures are studied and compared. They are classified into two groups which are separated by a large activation barrier. In one group, (2×1), p(2×2), and c(4×2) structures are almost degenerate in energy, which can result in diffuse (2×1) LEED patterns. In the other group, a second-order phase transition can occur from the c(2×2) to the disordered structure at ∼800 K. Domains of different structures may coexist on the actual surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ihm et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: