Key result
The -786T>C and Glu298>Asp variants of NOS3 were not associated with incident cardiovascular events, although the -786T>C variant correlated with on-treatment blood pressure control.
Why the study?
Do NOS3 polymorphisms (-786T>C and Glu298>Asp) affect blood pressure control and incident cardiovascular events in elderly hypertensive patients with CAD?
Case-Control (n=1,025)
Randomly assigned (underlying cohort)
Do NOS3 polymorphisms (-786T>C and Glu298>Asp) affect blood pressure control and incident cardiovascular events in elderly hypertensive patients with CAD?
The NOS3 -786T>C polymorphism is associated with on-treatment blood pressure control in hypertensive CAD patients but does not predict incident cardiovascular events.
Does not support NOS3 genotyping for event prediction in hypertensive CAD patients; hypothesis-generating for BP control associations.
BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) gene increase susceptibility to hypertension and cardiovascular disease. We examined genetic and pharmacogenetic associations between NOS3 polymorphisms, blood pressure (BP) control, and cardiovascular events in elderly, hypertensive coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. METHODS: Patients with CAD were randomly assigned to either verapamil SR- or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment and followed for cardiovascular events. Cases (all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke) and an age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-matched control population were genotyped for the -786T>C and Glu298>Asp polymorphisms in NOS3. On-treatment BP and BP control were compared across genotype groups. Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the -786T>C and Glu298>Asp polymorphisms in the combined population and in randomized treatment groups. RESULTS: Genotype data were available for 256 cases and 769 controls. Among controls, mean on-treatment BP differed according to -786T>C genotype (T/T 137/78 mm Hg, T/C 133/76 mm Hg, C/C 133/75 mm Hg; P = 0.0007 for systolic, P = 0.09 for diastolic) which corresponded to differing rates of BP control (T/T 63%, T/C 72%, C/C 88%; P = 0.002). Neither polymorphisms was associated with case status, with or without regard to assigned treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The -786T>C, but not the Glu298>Asp variant of NOS3, may correlate with BP but do not appear to be associated with incident cardiovascular events in patients with established cardiovascular disease. The antihypertensive treatment approach did not appear to alter the genetic contribution to either BP control or cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pacanowski et al. (2009) conducted a case-control in Hypertension and coronary artery disease (n=1,025). NOS3 polymorphisms (-786T>C and Glu298>Asp) vs. Wild-type/other genotypes was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular events (all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). The -786T>C and Glu298>Asp variants of NOS3 were not associated with incident cardiovascular events, although the -786T>C variant correlated with on-treatment blood pressure control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: