Key result
The Emergency Surgery Frailty Index (EmSFI) demonstrated good accuracy in predicting 30-day mortality among elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery, with an AUC of 0.762 in the validation cohort.
Why the study?
Frailty predisposes elderly patients to worse surgical outcomes, making accurate surgical risk stratification paramount in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery.
Cohort (n=1,024)
Yes
The EmSFI is a simple, valid bedside tool for predicting 30-day mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery, though its ability to predict morbidity is limited.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EmSFI may aid mortality risk stratification in elderly emergency surgery patients; leaves open external validation and morbidity prediction.
Background Frailty assessment has acquired an increasing importance in recent years and it has been demonstrated that this vulnerable profile predisposes elderly patients to a worse outcome after surgery. Therefore, it becomes paramount to perform an accurate stratification of surgical risk in elderly undergoing emergency surgery. Study design 1024 patients older than 65 years who required urgent surgical procedures were prospectively recruited from 38 Italian centers participating to the multicentric FRAILESEL (Frailty and Emergency Surgery in the Elderly) study, between December 2016 and May 2017. A univariate analysis was carried out, with the purpose of developing a frailty index in emergency surgery called “EmSFI”. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was then performed to test the accuracy of our predictive score. Results 784 elderly patients were consecutively enrolled, constituting the development set and results were validated considering further 240 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgical procedures. A logistic regression analysis was performed identifying different EmSFI risk classes. The model exhibited good accuracy as regard to mortality for both the development set (AUC = 0.731 [95% CI 0.654–0.772]; HL test χ2 = 6.780; p = 0.238) and the validation set (AUC = 0.762 [95% CI 0.682–0.842]; HL test χ2 = 7.238; p = 0.299). As concern morbidity, our model showed a moderate accuracy in the development group, whereas a poor discrimination ability was observed in the validation cohort. Conclusions The validated EmSFI represents a reliable and time-sparing tool, despite its discriminative value decreased regarding complications. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate specifically surgical settings, validating the EmSFI prognostic role in assessing the procedure-related morbidity risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Emergency abdominal surgery in elderly patients (n=1,024). Emergency Surgery Frailty Index (EmSFI) was evaluated on Mortality prediction accuracy (Area Under the Curve) in the validation cohort (AUC 0.762, 95% CI 0.682-0.842). The Emergency Surgery Frailty Index (EmSFI) demonstrated good accuracy in predicting 30-day mortality among elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery, with an AUC of 0.762 in the validation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: