Why the study?
Does the dynamic morphology of the mitral valve differ between Barlow disease, Fibroelastic deficiency, and normal controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=77)
Single-blind
No
Does the dynamic morphology of the mitral valve differ between Barlow disease, Fibroelastic deficiency, and normal controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.4% vs 9.69%
p-value: p=0.001
Barlow disease and fibroelastic deficiency exhibit distinct mitral annular dynamics, with Barlow annuli being remarkably flattened and hypodynamic, which may influence the selection of annuloplasty rings during surgical repair.
Barlow annuli are flatter and less dynamic than in fibroelastic deficiency; extends subtype phenotyping but leaves clinical implications open.
BACKGROUND: Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography has increased our understanding of the distinct pathomechanisms underlying functional, ischaemic or degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, potential differences in dynamic morphology between the subtypes of degenerative mitral prolapse have scarcely been investigated. METHODS: In order to compare the dynamic behavior of the different phenotypes of degenerative mitral valve prolapse, real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography recordings of 77 subjects, 27 with Barlow disease (BD), 32 with Fibroelastic deficiency (FED) and 18 normal controls (NC) were analysed. RESULTS: Geometric annular and valvular parameters of the myxomatous patients were significantly larger compared to controls (BD vs. FED vs. NC 3D annular area: 15 ± 2.8 vs. 13.3 ± 2.4 vs. 10.6 ± 2.3cm(2), all p < 0.01). Beside similar ellipticity, BD annuli were significantly flatter compared to FED. Myxomatous annuli appeared less dynamic than normals, with decreased overall 3D area change, however only the BD group differed from NC significantly (BD vs. FED vs. NC normalized 3D area change 4.40 vs. 6.81 vs. 9.69 %; BD vs. NC p = 0.000; FED vs. NC p = not significant, BD vs. FED p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: BD and FED differ not only in terms of valve morphology, but also annular dynamics. Both pathologies are characterized by annular dilatation. However, in BD the annulus is remarkably flattened and hypodynamic, whereas in FED its saddle-shape and contractile function is relatively preserved. These features might influence the choice of repair technique and the selection of annuloplasty ring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apor et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Degenerative mitral valve prolapse (Barlow disease and Fibroelastic deficiency) (n=77). Barlow disease and Fibroelastic deficiency vs. Normal controls was evaluated on Normalized 3D area change (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: