Key result
A circularly polarized electric field successfully induced wave emission from elliptical heterogeneities at a lower critical voltage (0.5 V/cm) regardless of orientation compared to a uniform electric field.
Why the study?
The effect of a circularly polarized electric field on wave emission from heterogeneities with irregular boundary shapes remains unknown.
Does a circularly polarized electric field improve wave emission from heterogeneities compared to a uniform electric field in simulated cardiac tissues?
Does a circularly polarized electric field improve wave emission from heterogeneities compared to a uniform electric field in simulated cardiac tissues?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.5% vs 0.7%
In a computational model of cardiac tissue, a circularly polarized electric field requires a lower voltage and is immune to changing boundary curvatures and orientations compared to a uniform electric field for inducing wave emission from heterogeneities.
May enable lower-energy, orientation-independent WEH in cardiac models; leaves open clinical translation and in vivo testing.
In hearts, complex spatial–temporal patterns of action potential waves may cause life-threatening arrhythmia. Unlike the conventional defibrillation which uses high-voltage electric shocks associated with severe side effects, the new method of wave emission from heterogeneities (WEHs) merits close investigation. In our previous studies of the WEH to terminate arrhythmia in idealized conditions, we found that a circularly polarized electric field (CPEF) not only needs a lower voltage, but also has higher efficiency than a uniform electric field (UEF). But the effect of a CPEF on a real cardiac heterogeneity with irregular boundary shape remains unknown. Here, we consider elliptical heterogeneities whose boundary curvatures and orientations change in a similar way as irregular heterogeneities and study the effect of the changing boundary curvature and orientation on the WEH. We find that, unlike the UEF, the CPEF is not affected by the change of boundary curvature and orientation. Besides, the CPEF needs a lower voltage to induce wave emission from an elliptical heterogeneity than the UEF. Hence, it has advantages for the application of the WEH in clinical treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2019) studied Arrhythmia (simulated). Circularly polarized electric field (CPEF) vs. Uniform electric field (UEF) was evaluated on Critical electric field strength to induce wave emission. A circularly polarized electric field successfully induced wave emission from elliptical heterogeneities at a lower critical voltage (0.5 V/cm) regardless of orientation compared to a uniform electric field.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: