Key result
Optimization of atrioventricular and ventricular-to-ventricular delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics, though consensus on its clinical implementation remains lacking.
Why the study?
Does optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) delays improve hemodynamics in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Does optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) delays improve hemodynamics in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
While optimization of AV and VV delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics, there remains a lack of consensus on its standardized clinical implementation.
Supports hemodynamic benefit of AV/VV optimization in CRT; leaves open standardized clinical implementation.
Cardiac resynchronization is now an accepted and widespread therapy for patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. However, there are still a significant number of patients that do not appear to gain benefit, and this is currently the focus of a great deal of research. Contemporary resynchronization devices allow manipulation of both atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) delays and there is evidence that optimization of these delays has a positive effect on hemodynamics. However, there are many ways that optimization can be performed and there is little consensus on how, if at all, it should be incorporated into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhan et al. (2008) conducted a review in Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and ventricular-to-ventricular (VV) delays was evaluated. Optimization of atrioventricular and ventricular-to-ventricular delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics, though consensus on its clinical implementation remains lacking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: