Key result
Preeclampsia did not significantly alter fetal left Mod-MPI compared to normotensive pregnancies (0.60 vs 0.59, p=0.341), but was associated with higher neonatal MV-E PV (51.1 vs 43.56 cm/s, p=0.036).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare fetal and neonatal global, systolic, and diastolic cardiac functions between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies.
Does preeclampsia alter fetal and neonatal cardiac functions compared to normotensive pregnancies?
Cohort (n=58)
No
Does preeclampsia alter fetal and neonatal cardiac functions compared to normotensive pregnancies?
Preeclampsia is associated with higher neonatal mitral valve E peak systolic velocity but does not significantly alter fetal global cardiac and diastolic functions compared to normotensive pregnancies.
Preeclampsia-associated neonatal mitral E elevation should not change practice; leaves open fetal cardiac effects and needs prospective confirmation.
Objective: To compare fetal and neonatal cardiac functions in terms of global, systolic, and diastolic function between the preeclampsia and normotensive blood pressure of pregnancies. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Northeast Thailand. Twenty-nine pregnancies diagnosed as preeclampsia with or without severe features were compared with 29 normotensive pregnancies. Global cardiac, systolic, and diastolic function were assessed at prenatal and postnatal periods, by a professionally trained obstetrician and pediatric cardiologist, respectively. Results: The fetal left modified myocardium performance index (Mod-MPI) in preeclampsia and normotensive blood pressure were 0.60± 0.08 and 0.59± 0.08 ( p -value=0.341), respectively, while fetal right Mod-MPI were 0.57± 0.16 and 0.54± 0.21 ( p -value=0.861), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of fetal isovolumic contraction time (ICT), isovolumic relaxation time (IRT), ejection time (ET), aortic peak systolic velocity (Ao PSV), pulmonary artery peak systolic velocity (PA PSV), mitral valve (MV) E:A ratio, or tricuspid valve (TV) E:A ratios between the two groups. Neonatal mitral valve E peak systolic velocity (MV-E PV) in preeclamptic and normotensive blood pressure groups were significantly different at 51.1± 8.02 cm/s and 43.56± 5.21cm/s ( p -value=0.036), respectively, whereas neonatal left Mod-MPI, mitral valve A peak systolic velocity (MV-A PV), MV E:A ratio, and Ao PSV were not significantly different ( p -value=0.436, 0.119, 0.379, and 0.709), respectively. Conclusion: Neonatal MV-E PV of the preeclampsia group was significantly higher than the normotensive blood pressure group, while there were no statistically significant differences in terms of global cardiac and diastolic functions during the fetal period between two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Promket et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Preeclampsia (n=58). Preeclampsia vs. Normotensive pregnancies was evaluated on Fetal left modified myocardium performance index (Mod-MPI) (p=0.341). Preeclampsia did not significantly alter fetal left Mod-MPI compared to normotensive pregnancies (0.60 vs 0.59, p=0.341), but was associated with higher neonatal MV-E PV (51.1 vs 43.56 cm/s, p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: