Why the study?
Does first trimester ultrasound screening assessing the four chambers' view allow for the early detection of congenital heart defects in fetuses?
Does first trimester ultrasound screening assessing the four chambers' view allow for the early detection of congenital heart defects in fetuses?
Assessment of the four chambers of the fetal heart during the first trimester nuchal translucency scan is feasible and allows for the early detection of nearly half of congenital heart defects.
Supports first-trimester four-chamber assessment feasibility; leaves open whether routine use improves CHD outcomes in prospective cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy to screen for congenital heart defects (CHD) during the first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound examination by assessing the four chambers' view of fetal heart. METHODS: Pregnancies that were examined prospectively by ultrasound in the first trimester (11th-14th week), the second (19th-24th week) and third trimester were included in the study. 3774 fetuses were examined and fetal heart was assessed during the NT scan by examining the four chambers view. Detailed echocardiography was performed during the anomaly and growth scans. Diagnosis of congenital heart defects (CHD) was further confirmed by a fetal cardiologist. RESULTS: The four chambers view was obtained in 99.52% of the cases. CHD were diagnosed in 29 fetuses (0.77%). Thirteen cases (44.8%) were detected during the 11-13 weeks' scan, 14 cases (48.3%) during the anomaly scan, 1 CHD (3.5%) during the third trimester scan and 1 case (3.5%) postpartum. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the four chambers of fetal heart early in pregnancy was feasible and allowed the detection of 45% of CHD. Additional parameters of fetal cardiac anatomy during the NT scan may further improve the detection rate providing pregnancy management information early in the first trimester.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eleftheriades et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: