Why the study?
Does internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation (with repeated brief cardiac arrests) cause neurocognitive dysfunction and neuronal injury compared to pacemaker insertion in patients undergoing device placement?
Population
42 patients undergoing internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (n=21) or pacemaker (PM) insertion (n=21).
Comparison
Internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation. vs Pacemaker (PM) insertion.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
up to 24 hours postoperatively
Authors
Loading...
Suggests neurocognitive risk after ICD implantation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Does internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation (with repeated brief cardiac arrests) cause neurocognitive dysfunction and neuronal injury compared to pacemaker insertion in patients undergoing device placement?
ICD implantation, which involves brief periods of global brain ischemia, is associated with measurable neuronal injury and deteriorating neurocognitive function compared to pacemaker insertion.
Weigl et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: