Why the study?
Left atrial enlargement predicts progression to heart failure in degenerative mitral valve disease, but accessible, non-invasive markers for preclinical remodeling are needed for timely risk stratification.
Does P-wave duration correlate with echocardiographic metrics of left atrial remodeling in healthy Shih Tzu dogs?
Does P-wave duration correlate with echocardiographic metrics of left atrial remodeling in healthy Shih Tzu dogs?
P-wave duration serves as a sensitive, non-invasive biomarker for preclinical cardiac remodeling in Shih Tzu dogs, aiding in early risk stratification.
Degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD) is the most prevalent canine cardiac condition, with left atrial enlargement (LAE) being a critical predictor of progression to congestive heart failure (CHF) and arrhythmogenesis. Identifying accessible, non-invasive markers for preclinical according with the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine - ACVIM (ACVIM Stage A) remodeling is paramount for timely risk stratification. This study investigated the relationship between electrocardiographic (ECG) P-wave duration and key echocardiographic metrics: indexed left atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV IDX), LA/Ao ratio, and normalized Left Ventricular internal diameter (LVIDDn), in a tightly controlled cohort of 22 Shih Tzu dogs (ACVIM Stage A). The mean P-wave duration was 39.55±3.63 ms. Significant positive correlations were found with all remodeling parameters (p<0.05), being the strongest with LAESV IDX (r = 0.61; p=0.002). Linear regression established LAESV IDX as the most robust predictor of P-wave duration (adjusted R²=0.342; p=0.002). Reference thresholds were derived based on ACVIM criteria and sample P95 (LAESV IDX: 44 ms; LA/Ao: 49ms). A transition zone (44-49 ms) suggestive of incipient LAE is proposed. P-wave duration is concluded to be a sensitive, readily available, non-invasive biomarker of preclinical cardiac remodeling in Shih Tzu dogs, enhancing tools for early risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanches et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: