Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is now acknowledged that the pattern of HLA-G expression is not restricted to extravillous cytotrophoblast cells, as several studies described HLA-G in HLA class I+ cells, such as thymic epithelial cells, cytokine-activated monocytes and some tumors. In these situations, HLA-G may provide an additional inhibitory signal to escape from NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to define the behavior of HLA-G once it is co-expressed into an HLA-A, -B, -C and -E+ cell line. For this purpose, HLA-G1 cDNA was transfected into an HLA class I+ melanoma cell line which was used as a target towards freshly isolated peripheral blood NK cells. Cytotoxic experiments using either anti-HLA-G1 or anti-HLA-G1 inhibitory receptor mAb show that HLA-G1 boosts the HLA class I-mediated inhibition of polyclonal NK cells through interaction with ILT-2, which appears as the major HLA-G1 inhibitory receptor involved. Nevertheless, HLA-G1 is also able to inhibit the cytolytic activity of an ILT-2- NK clone which otherwise expresses another HLA-G1 inhibitory receptor belonging to the KIR103 gene family. In order to more precisely define the relative role exerted by HLA-G1 versus -E on polyclonal NK cells, antibody-blocking assays were carried out using either anti-HLA class I or anti-CD94/NKG2A. Results demonstrate that in the absence of HLA-G1, the naturally expressed HLA class I-mediated NK inhibition is predominantly exerted by HLA-E through binding with CD94/NKG2A. In contrast, once HLA-G1 is expressed, it becomes the major NK inhibitory ligand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riteau et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: