Why the study?
The study compared resting blood pressure and post-exercise hypotension using ABPM between land exercise and aquatic exercise in elderly hypertensives.
Does aquatic exercise improve resting blood pressure and post-exercise hypotension compared to land exercise in elderly hypertensive women?
Does aquatic exercise improve resting blood pressure and post-exercise hypotension compared to land exercise in elderly hypertensive women?
Aquatic exercise may provide superior daytime blood pressure reduction and longer-lasting post-exercise hypotension compared to land exercise in elderly hypertensive women.
Aquatic exercise was associated with lower daytime BP in elderly hypertensive women; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared resting blood pressure (BP) using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) responses in two groups of subjects trained in land exercise (LE) and aquatic exercise (AE), and assessed post-exercise hypotension (PEH) using ABPM, after land- and aquatic-based exercises. METHODS: ABPM (24 hours) was used to measure the baseline BP in elderly hypertensive women trained in LE and AE and the PEH induced by exercise. For this, 40 subjects were evaluated at rest and after a land- or aquatic-based exercise session (aerobic: 75% of reserve heart rate combined with resistance exercise). RESULTS: The daytime BP was lower for AE [systolic BP (SBP) 124 ± 1.0 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) 70 ± 1.5 mmHg] than for LE (SBP 134 ± 0.9 mmHg, DBP 76 ± 0.9 mmHg), but there were no differences at night-time. The aquatic exercise-induced PEH in the second hour was maintained at the 24th hour post-exercise. For land exercise-induced PEH, it was maintained at the 12th hour post-exercise. The SBP and DBP were lower at the 24th hour for AE than for LE. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly hypertensive people trained in AE had lower baseline BP during the daytime. SBP and DBP values were lower for individuals trained in AE, and their PEH was more rapid and longer lasting after AE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Júnior et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: