Why the study?
What is the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with early-stage chronic kidney disease?
What is the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with early-stage chronic kidney disease?
Pulmonary hypertension is highly prevalent (52.3%) in patients with chronic kidney disease, and its prevalence in early stages is similar to that in stage 5.
PHT screening may warrant consideration in early CKD; leaves open prognostic impact and management effects in prospective studies.
Aim: Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) was recently described as a cardiovascular complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are many studies on the prevalence of PHT in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD); however, there are no data on the presence or prevalence of PHT in patients with early-stage kidney disease. Materials and Methods: The demographic and laboratory findings for 172 adult patients with stage 1-5 CKD, as well as Doppler echocardiographic findings were evaluated. Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) was compared according to CKD stage, and also between the patients in stages 1-4 and those in stage 5 with and without AVF. Results: Mean age of the patients was 55.4 ± 15.2 years. Mean sPAP in the entire study group was 34.5 ± 5.7 mmHg and PHT was noted in 90 (52.3 %) patients. Mean sPAP and the prevalence of PHT were similar in the stage 1-4 patients and stage 5 patients, regardless of HD (P=0.86). The serum calcium level was significantly lower and the serum intact parathyroid hormone level was significantly higher in patients with PHT than in those without PHT (P = 0.02, and P = 0.03). Conclusion: The present findings show that the prevalence of PHT in patients with early stage CKD was similar to those with stage 5 CKD. Due to the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with PHT, follow-up of sPAP via Doppler echocardiography might be indicated in all patients with CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yenigün et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: