Why the study?
Although fragmented QRS can predict arrhythmic events in various cardiac diseases, the association between fragmented QRS recordings on intracardiac electrogram and ventricular arrhythmic events remained unknown.
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on intracardiac electrograms predict arrhythmic events in patients with an ICD and structural heart disease?
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on intracardiac electrograms predict arrhythmic events in patients with an ICD and structural heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The presence of fragmented QRS on intracardiac electrograms and surface ECG is a significant predictor of ventricular arrhythmic events in patients with structural heart disease and an ICD.
Background Studies suggest that fragmented QRS (fQRS) can predict arrhythmic events in various cardiac diseases. However, the association between fQRS recordings on intracardiac electrogram (EGM) and ventricular arrhythmic events remains unknown. Methods We enrolled 51 patients (age, 62 ± 12 years; 40 men) with an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) and structural heart disease and evaluated surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and EGM measurement of fQRS and the association between fQRS and arrhythmic events. Results fQRS was detected on surface ECG and ICD‐EGM in 12 (23.5%) and 15 (29.4%) patients, respectively. fQRS was detected more frequently on ICD‐EGM in patients with fQRS on surface ECG than in patients without fQRS (7/12 [58.3%] vs 8/39 patients [20.5%], P = .01). Appropriate ICD therapies were documented in 16 patients. Among these patients, fQRS was detected more frequently on surface ECG and ICD‐EGM in patients with appropriate ICD therapies (8/16, 50.0%; P = .001 and 11/16, 68.9%; P < .001). Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was significantly more frequent in patients with appropriate ICD therapies (15/16, 93.8%; P = .04). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that fQRS on ICD‐EGM was a predictor of arrhythmic events (P = .03). Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis revealed that ICD therapies were significantly more frequent among patients with fQRS on both surface ECG and ICD‐EGM than among those without fQRS (66.7% vs 6.6%, P < .001). Conclusion The presence of fQRS on ICD‐EGM can be a predictor of arrhythmic events in ICD patients. Surface ECG and ICD‐EGM measurement may help predict ventricular arrhythmic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osaka et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: