Key result
Fragmented QRS in primary prevention HF linked to ~51% higher ventricular arrhythmia risk.
Why the study?
Many primary prevention heart failure patients with an ICD rarely experience life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, necessitating new strategies to identify patients most at risk who would benefit from an ICD.
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on the electrocardiogram predict ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality in primary prevention heart failure patients with LVEF ≤40%?
Meta-Analysis (n=3,885)
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on the electrocardiogram predict ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality in primary prevention heart failure patients with LVEF ≤40%?
Effect estimate: OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.02-2.25)
p-value: p=0.04
The presence of fragmented QRS on the electrocardiogram is a significant predictor of ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality in primary prevention heart failure patients with LVEF ≤40%.
fQRS may identify higher-risk primary prevention HF patients; leaves open its role in refining ICD selection.
INTRODUCTION: Many primary prevention heart failure (HF) patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) rarely experience life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VA). New strategies are required to identify patients most at risk of VA and sudden cardiac death who would benefit from an ICD. One potential method is the detection of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on the electrocardiogram. The aim was to assess the predictive capacity of fQRS for VA and mortality in ischemic (ICM) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) primary prevention HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining fQRS in HF patients with or without an ICD who met primary prevention indications with reduced ejection fraction ≤40%. Outcome measures were VA (or appropriate ICD therapy) and all-cause mortality. Ten studies involving 3885 patients were included for analysis. Most patients were male with non-fQRS patients being significantly younger (-1.5[-2.66, -0.42], p = .03). Diabetes was more likely in fQRS patients (1.12[1.01, 1.25], p = .03) while non-fQRS patients were 28% more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation (0.82[0.67,1.00], p = .05). Ventricular arrhythmias were significantly 1.5 times more likely in patients with fQRS (1.51[1.02, 2.25], p = .04). HF patients were 1.7 times more likely to die of any cause if fQRS was present (1.68[1.13, 2.52], p = .01). NICM patients with fQRS have a significant 2.6-fold increased incidence of death compared with ICM patients (2.55[1.63, 3.98], p < .0001). CONCLUSION: fQRS is associated with VA and all-cause mortality and may be a novel marker in the risk stratification of primary prevention HF patients indicated for ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engstrom et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=3,885). Fragmented QRS (fQRS) vs. No fragmented QRS (non-fQRS) was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmias (or appropriate ICD therapy) (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.25, p=0.04). Fragmented QRS in primary prevention heart failure patients was associated with increased ventricular arrhythmias (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.02-2.25) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.13-2.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: