Why the study?
Does the presence of fragmented QRS predict appropriate ICD therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Does the presence of fragmented QRS predict appropriate ICD therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
The presence of fragmented QRS on a routine 12-lead ECG is a strong, independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
fQRS may aid risk stratification in ICD recipients; leaves open prospective validation before guiding therapy.
BACKGROUND: Fragmented QRS (fQRS) has been shown to be a marker of local myocardial conduction abnormalities and a predictor of cardiac events in selected populations. We hypothesized that the presence of a fQRS might predict arrhythmic events in patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), regardless of the indications for implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 107 consecutive patients (mean age, 53 years; 82% male) who underwent an ICD implantation was studied. We defined fQRS, on a routine 12-lead ECG, as the presence of an additional R wave or notching in the nadir of the S wave in 2 consecutive leads corresponding to a major coronary artery territory. In the presence of bundle branch block, more than 2 notches in the R or S waves in 2 consecutive leads were required to characterize fQRS. Patients were followed for 21.3±23 months for appropriate ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing and/or shock). ICDs were implanted predominantly in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (N=45, 42.1%), followed by Brugada syndrome (N=26, 24.3%). fQRS presented in 42 patients (39.3%). During follow-up, patients with fQRS received more appropriate ICD therapy than those without fQRS (45.2% vs. 10.8%, P<0.0001). After adjustment for covariates, fQRS remained an independent predictor for appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio=5.32, 95% confidence interval=2.11-13.37, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The presence of fQRS appeared to be directly associated with appropriate ICD therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apiyasawat et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: