Why the study?
Does a rule-based decision-making diagnosis system using fuzzy petri nets improve the evaluation of arteriovenous shunt stenosis in hemodialysis patients?
Does a rule-based decision-making diagnosis system using fuzzy petri nets improve the evaluation of arteriovenous shunt stenosis in hemodialysis patients?
A novel fuzzy petri net-based diagnostic system using phonoangiography may efficiently evaluate arteriovenous shunt stenosis in hemodialysis patients.
Does not support clinical adoption; leaves open validation of fuzzy petri net systems in larger hemodialysis trials.
This paper proposes a rule-based decision-making diagnosis system to evaluate arteriovenous shunt (AVS) stenosis for long-term hemodialysis treatment of patients using fuzzy petri nets (FPNs). AVS stenoses are often associated with blood sounds, resulting from turbulent flow over the narrowed blood vessel. Phonoangiography provides a noninvasive technique to monitor the sounds of the AVS. Since the power spectra changes in frequency and amplitude with the degree of AVS stenosis, it is difficult to make a human-made decision to judge the degree using a combination of those variances. The Burg autoregressive (AR) method is used to estimate the frequency spectra of a phonoangiographic signal and identify the characteristic frequencies. A rule-based decision-making method, FPNs, is designed as a decision-making system to evaluate the degree of stenosis (DOS) in routine examinations. For 42 long-term follow-up patients, the examination results show the proposed diagnosis system has greater efficiency in evaluating AVS stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: