Why the study?
What is the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and familial endogenous hyperlipoproteinemia?
What is the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and familial endogenous hyperlipoproteinemia?
The apparent independent inheritance of diabetes and hyperlipoproteinemia may actually result from bidirectional deviations in individuals starting with uniform familial disorders like insulin resistance.
May refine diabetes phenotype classification in hyperlipoproteinemia families; leaves open shared pathogenesis versus independent inheritance.
The relationship between a certain form of type 2 diabetes mellitus and familial endogenous hyperlipoproteinemia still remains confused. Therefore, we examined glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in 133 members (6-80 years old) of 15 families with a history of endogenous hyperlipoproteinemia. A segregation study was carried out to compare the prevalence of diabetes in hyperlipoproteinemic and normolipoproteinemic relatives, and the results seemed to support the recent concept that diabetes and hyperlipoproteinemia are inherited independently. However, the age-group analysis revealed that insulin secretion was progressively impaired with aging and about a third of the elderly group was significantly insulinopenic. Diabetes thus occurred in 0-2.6% of subjects under 40 years of age, 9.8% of those of 41-60 years of age and in 26.3% of those over the age of 61 years, occasionally complicated by diabetic retinopathy. Interestingly, insulinopenic diabetes was not accompanied by hyperlipoproteinemia, but hyperinsulinemic cases remained hyperlipoproteinemic. Therefore, the possibility arises that the independent occurrence of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipoproteinemia suggested by this crosssectional segregation study may result from bidirectional deviations in individuals who started out with uniform familial disorders such as insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshisuke Maruhama (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: