Why the study?
Does amlodipine monotherapy have differential effects on endothelial vasomotor function, pulse wave velocity, and blood pressure across gender and age groups in patients with stage 1-2 arterial hypertension?
Does amlodipine monotherapy have differential effects on endothelial vasomotor function, pulse wave velocity, and blood pressure across gender and age groups in patients with stage 1-2 arterial hypertension?
Amlodipine monotherapy improves endothelial function and has a more pronounced antihypertensive effect in women compared to men, while postmenopausal women show accelerated vascular aging.
May support sex-specific amlodipine responses in hypertension; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Aim. To study gender differences of endothelial vasomotor function and pulse wave velocity (PWV) in patients with arterial hypertension (HT) and to evaluate effects of amlodipine (Normodipine, Gedeon Richter) on these parameters. Material and methods. 57 patients with HT of 1-2 stages were involved in the study. Patients were randomized to 4 groups: women under 50 y.o. (group 1), women older than 60 y.o. (group 2), men under 50 y.o. (group 3) and men older than 60 y.o. (group 4). Endothelium vasomotor function was estimated by ultrasonography. PWV was estimated by volume sphygmography. Patients received antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine during 12 weeks. Results. The lowest levels of systolic blood pressure (BP), normal endothelium function and PWV were observed in women with normal menses. The highest levels of pulse BP were found in menopausal women. Amlodipine monotherapy had better antihypertensive effect in women than in men. BP target levels were reached in 60% of amlodipine treated women. Besides amlodipine improved vascular endothelial function. Сonclusion. Disorders of endothelial function and PWV begin later in women than in men, however after menopause the rate of these disorders development in women is faster than in men of similar age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katelnitskaya et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: